The Ideas in Sandra Cisneross Only Daughter and Deborah Tannens Sex, Essay

The Ideas in Sandra Cisneross Only Daughter and Deborah Tannens Sex, Lies, and Conversation - Essay ExampleThe decision of gender plays different roles within Cisneross and Tannens pieces. Cisneros makes a salient deal that she was the only daughter of a family of seven children. She desperately wanted to have her father be eminent of what she did writing. I wanted my father to get wind what it was I was scribbling, to introduce me as My only daughter, the writer. Not as This is only my daughter. She teaches. Es maestra teacher. Not even profesora. The structure of Cisneross story is short and to the point. The design of the essay is to show how Cisneross professional development progressed from being basically an unknown writer to, ten years later, having had a lot of success as a writer. The purpose of gender in Tannens essay is to show the difference in communication patterns amongst men and women. The communication problems that endanger man and wife cant be fixed by mech anical engineering. They require a new conceptual framework to the highest degree the role of talk in human relationships. Essentially, Tannen is facial expression we need to be able to rework the role of conversation between men and women. The structure of the essay begins by Tannen telling a story ab break through how women talk less in public than in men. The purpose of the essay was to draw attention to why this mix-up in communications causes divorces. The explanation for the purpose of gender in these two essays is completely different betwixt the twoand the opposite sex (men) is mentioned in Cisneross piece but not closely as much as in Tannens. The structure of the essays were different in that Cisneross piece was short and Tannens long. Both essays had a common purpose, however, which was to gibe the value in womens contributions. III. The Outcomes From the Two Stories ? The outcome from Sandra Cisneross story was her professional development. Last year, after ten years of writing professionally, the financial rewards started to trickle in. My hour National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship. A guest professorship at the University of California, Berkeley. My book, which sold to a major New York publishing house.3 The outcome for Tannen was talking about what bound women together conversation. For women, as for girls, intimacy is the fabric of relationships, and talk is the thread from which it is woven.4 The explanation that draws a line in the sand between these two different pieces is that Sandra Cisneros is talking about how she, as a writer, overcame her struggles in order to become a writer and to ultimately make her father proudwhich was the sole greatest achievement that Cisneros found?worthwhile to achieve. The main attraction of Tannens article is that she is talking about how gender differences severely impair relationships and head for the hills to divorce. In terms of theme, the outcomes from these two storied essays are vastly diffe rent. In fact, Tannens assertion at the end of her piece that people who cannot work things out should just get divorced, makes all of her prior assertions about relationships seem invalidbecause she is advocating divorce. This proves that she doesnt really value the male-female relationship enough to want to preserve it